Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
ISSN (Print): 1309-0682 -

Araştırma Makalesi    |    Açık Erişim
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2018, Clt. 12(23) 124-138

Investigation Self Efficacy of Fine-Arts Teachers According to Different Variables

Kerem Coskun & Meral Coşkun

ss. 124 - 138   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.138.8

Yayın Tarihi: Nisan 21, 2018  |   Görüntüleme Sayısı: 172/903   |   İndirilme Sayısı: 214/1.793

PDF İndir

Özet

Purpose of the present study is to investigate self-efficacy of fine arts teachers according to different variables. The present study was designed in correlational research. 230 fine arts teachers were included through convenience sampling. The data were collected through the FATSES developed by Kayserili, Coskun, & Coskun (2017). The data were analysed through Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, Mann-Whitney-U Test, and Kruskal Wallis Test. As a result of the data analysis, it was found that fine-arts teaching self-efficacy does not vary according to marital status and gender variables, but there is a significant difference in terms of years of experience. The Fine-arts teachers with over 21 years of experience scores are significantly higher than the fine arts teachers whose years of experience are lower than 21 years. Research findings were addressed social-cognitive theory and professional life cycle of Huberman (1989). In addition to that it was concluded that marriage does not lead to decrease in self-efficacy of married fine-arts teachers and teaching fine-arts is not gendered profession.

Anaktar kelimeler: Self-efficacy, fine-arts teachers, marital status, gender, and years of experience

Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır

APA 7th edition
Coskun, K., & Coskun, M. (2018). Investigation Self Efficacy of Fine-Arts Teachers According to Different Variables . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(23), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.138.8

Harvard
Coskun, K. and Coskun, M. (2018). Investigation Self Efficacy of Fine-Arts Teachers According to Different Variables . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(23), pp. 124-138.

Chicago 16th edition
Coskun, Kerem and Meral Coskun (2018). "Investigation Self Efficacy of Fine-Arts Teachers According to Different Variables ". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 12 (23):124-138. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.138.8

Kaynakça
  1. Azar, A. (2010). In-service and pre-service secondary science teachers' self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(4), 175-188. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy in human agency. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122-147. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 117-148. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9 (3), 75-78. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bandura, A.(1999).Self-Efficacy Efficacy in Changing Societies. (Ed, A. Bandura). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blonder, R., Benny, N., & Jones, M. G. (2014). Teaching self-efficacy of science teachers. In The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms (pp. 3-15). SensePublishers. [Google Scholar]
  8. Botkin, D. R., Weeks, M. N., & Morris, J. E. (2000). Changing marriage role expectations: 1961–1996. Sex Roles, 42(9-10), 933-942. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676-713. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cakiroglu, J., Capa-Aydin, Y., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Science teaching efficacy beliefs. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 449-461). Springer Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  11. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490. [Google Scholar]
  12. Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 819-831. [Google Scholar]
  13. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 423– 443 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gencer, A. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher education, 23(5), 664-675. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher education, 13(4), 451-458. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207-239. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders' literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3-24. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, Y., Justice, L. M., Sawyer, B., & Tompkins, V. (2011). Exploring factors related to preschool teachers’ self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 961-968. [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers' self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children's language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1094-1103. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guskey, T. (1988). Mastery learning and mastery teaching: how they complement each other . Principal, 68 (1), 6-8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774-786. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31-57. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kayserili, E., Coşkun, M., & Coşkun, K. (2017). Görsel sanatlar öğretimi öz-yeterlilik ölçeği: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalişmasi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(14), 73-84. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Y. H., & Kim, Y. E. (2010). Korean early childhood educators' multi-dimensional teacher self-efficacy and ECE center climate and depression severity in teachers as contributing factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1117-1123. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiviet, A. M., & Mji, A. (2003). Sex differences in self-efficacy beliefs of elementary science teachers. Psychological Reports, 92(1), 333-338. [Google Scholar]
  28. Klassen, R. M. (2010). Teacher stress: The mediating role of collective efficacy beliefs. The Journal of educational research, 103(5), 342-350. [Google Scholar]
  29. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. [Google Scholar]
  30. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, B., Cawthon, S., & Dawson, K. (2013). Elementary and secondary teacher self-efficacy for teaching and pedagogical conceptual change in a drama-based professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 84-98. [Google Scholar]
  32. Malinen, O. P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J., Nel, M., Nel, N., & Tlale, D. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 34-44. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramey‐Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self‐efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283-315. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Sawyer, B. E. (2004). Primary-grade teachers' self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes toward teaching, and discipline and teaching practice priorities in relation to the" responsive classroom" approach. The Elementary School Journal, 104(4), 321-341. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rosenthal. T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning and cognition. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ross, J. (1992). Teacher efficacy and effects of coaching on student achievement”. Canadian Journal of Education, 17 (1), 51-65. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 385– 400. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self‐efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology, 57(s1), 152-171. [Google Scholar]
  39. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stein, M. ve Wang M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171-187. [Google Scholar]
  41. Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary preservice teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139. [Google Scholar]
  42. Swars, S. L., Daane, C. J., & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: What is the relationship in elementary preservice teachers?. School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306-315. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, B. J. (2015). Science teacher self-efficacy and student achievement: A quantitative correlational study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix). [Google Scholar]
  44. Tschannen-Moran, M, Woolfolk-Hoy A. ve Hoy K.W.(1998). Teacher efficacy: ıts meaning and measurement. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2),202-248. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783– 805. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944 –956. [Google Scholar]
  47. Viel-Ruma, K., Houchins, D., Jolivette, K., & Benson, G. (2010). Efficacy beliefs of special educators: The relationships among collective efficacy, teacher self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(3), 225-233. [Google Scholar]
  48. Walker, J., & Slear, S. (2011). The IMPACT of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 46-64. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Clt. 12 (23)
Download
Metric
Geçimş
Benzer

Cilt 12 Sayı 23

Mart 2018

Tüm makaleleler

Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Copyright © 2025 Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website have been created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.