- Alkan, G. B. (2010). Derslerde PowerPoint sunumu: öğrenci algıları. Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu II, 16 - 18 Mayıs 2010, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara [Google Scholar]
- Alkan, G. B. (2013). PowerPoint ile işlenen derslere eleştirel bir bakış: öğrenci görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [H.U. Journal of Education], 44, 61-72 [Google Scholar]
- Aksoy, N. (2003). Eylem araştırması: eğitimsel uygulamaları iyileştirme ve değiştirmede kullanılacak bir yöntem. Kuram ve Uygualmada Eğitim Yönetimi, 36, 474-489 [Google Scholar]
- Apperson, J. M., Laws E.L. & Scpansky, J. A. (2006). The impact of presentation graphics on students’ experience in the classroom. Computer & Education, 47, 116-126. [Google Scholar]
- Apperson, J. M., Laws E. L. & Scpansky, J.A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computer & Education, 50, 148-153 [Google Scholar]
- Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (2003) Qualitative Research For Education, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
- Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming Critical. Education, knowledge and action research, Lewes: Falmer. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J. & Lin, T. (2008). Does downloading PowerPoint slides before the lecture lead to better student achievement? The International Review of Economics Education, 7(2), 9-18 [Google Scholar]
- Daniels, L., Kane, J. & Rosario, B. (2007). The impact of PowerPoint on student performance, course evaluations, and student preferences in economics courses: an experiment at three institutions. Allied Social Science Association Meeting, January 5 – 7, 2007, Chicago, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
- Levasseur, D. G. & Sawyer, J. K. (2006) Pedagogy Meets PowerPoint: A Research Review of the Effects of Computer-Generated Slides in the Classroom, Review of Communication, 6:1-2, 101-123 [Google Scholar]
- DenBeste, M. (2003). PowerPoint, Technology and the Web: More than just an overhead projector for the new century? The History Teacher. 36 (4), 491-504 [Google Scholar]
- Gelişli, Y. (2009). PowerPoint ile yapılan ders sunumlarının etkililiği. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 10 (2), 155-168 [Google Scholar]
- Jones, A. M. (2003). The use anda buse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in life sciences: a personal overview. BEE-J, (2) 04.01.2014 tarihinde http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/voln/beej-2-3.pdf adresinden erişildi. [Google Scholar]
- Kvavik, R.B., Caruso, J.B., & Morgan, G. (2004). ECAR study of students and information technology 2004: Convenience, connection, and control. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. 06.01.2014 tarihinde http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0405/rs/ers0405w.pdf adresinden erişildi. [Google Scholar]
- Levassaur, D. G. & Sawyer, J. K. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A Research Review on the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. Review of Communication, 6, 101-123 [Google Scholar]
- Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using Internet Class Notes and PowerPoint in the Physical Geology Lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(5), 301. [Google Scholar]
- Rickman, J. & Grudzinski, M. (2000). Student Expectation of information technology use in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 23(1), 24-30. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, M. K. (2007) ‘Action research’, the encyclopedia of informal education. 04.01.2014 tarihinde http://infed.org/mobi/action-research/ adresinden erişildi. [Google Scholar]
- Szabo, A. & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35, 175-187. [Google Scholar]
- Yalaki, Y. (2000). Finding effective ways of using computer presentations in Chemistry education. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Florida Eyalet Üniversitesi, Müfredat ve Öğretim Bölümü, Tallahassee, Florida, ABD. [Google Scholar]
- Yılmazel-Şahin, Y.(2009). A comparison of graduate and undergraduate teacher education students’ perceptions of their instructors’ use of Microsoft PowerPoint. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18 (3), 361-380 [Google Scholar]
|
