Araştırma Makalesi | Açık Erişim
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2014, Clt. 8(15) 1-10
In-Service Science Teachers’ Astronomy Misconceptions
ss. 1 - 10
Yayın Tarihi: Haziran 01, 2014 | Görüntüleme Sayısı: 222/821 | İndirilme Sayısı: 278/1.607
Özet
Pre-service science teachers in Turkey began to take undergraduate astronomy course in 2010. Science teachers who graduated before 2010 did not have any astronomy course during teacher preparation program. However, science education curriculum has some astronomy topics. If science teachers hold some misconceptions they will most likely transfer them to their students. The aim of this study was to explore in-service science teachers' astronomy misconceptions. The participants were 60 in-service science teachers who had no astronomy instruction before. Astronomy Concept Test was used to collect data. Based on the results it is found that in-service science teachers hold several misconceptions related to astronomy. The results of this study show that in-service science teachers need some instructional support about astronomy content to improve their understanding of astronomy related topics in middle school science curriculum.
Anaktar kelimeler: Astronomy misconceptions, in-service science teachers, astronomy education
APA 7th edition
Bektasli, B. (2014). In-Service Science Teachers’ Astronomy Misconceptions. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(15), 1-10.
Harvard
Bektasli, B. (2014). In-Service Science Teachers’ Astronomy Misconceptions. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(15), pp. 1-10.
Chicago 16th edition
Bektasli, Behzat (2014). "In-Service Science Teachers’ Astronomy Misconceptions". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 8 (15):1-10.
- Atwood, V. A., & Atwood, R. K. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of what causes night and day. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 290. [Google Scholar]
- Bektasli (2013). The development of astronomy concept test for determining pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions about astronomy. Education and Science, 38 (168). [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. (2004). A review of astronomy education research. Astronomy Education Review, 2(2). [Google Scholar]
- Barba, R., & Rubba, P. (1992). A comparison of pre-service and in-service earth and space science teachers’ general mental abilities, content knowledge, and problem solving skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 1021–1035. [Google Scholar]
- Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Bisard, W., Aron, R., Francek, M., & Nelson, B. (1994). Assessing selected physical science and earth science misconceptions of middle school through university preservice teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 24, 38-42. [Google Scholar]
- Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R., Letts IV, W.J., & Shipman, H.L. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340-362. [Google Scholar]
- Brunsell, E., & Marcks, J. (2005). Identifying a baseline for teachers’ astronomy content knowledge. Astronomy Education Review, 3(2). [Google Scholar]
- Hannust, T., & Kikas, E., (2007). Children’s knowledge of astronomy and its change in the course of learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 89-104. [Google Scholar]
- Lightman, A., & Sadler, P. (1993). Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. Physics Teacher,31, 162-167. [Google Scholar]
- MEB (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2006). Science and technology curriculum for elementary science. Retrieved 01 November, 2013, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72 [Google Scholar]
- MEB (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2013). Science curriculum for grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Retrieved 01 November, 2013, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151 [Google Scholar]
- National Science Board (2004). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. [Google Scholar]
- Ozdemir, G., & Clark, B.C. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351-361. [Google Scholar]
- Plummer, J.D., & Zahm, V. M. (2010). Covering the standards: Astronomy teachers’ preparation and beliefs. Astronomy Education Review, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and students’ misconceptions. Australian Science Teachers’Journal, 48(4), 24-28. [Google Scholar]
- Slater, T. F., Safko, J. L., & Carpenter, J. R. (1999). Long-term attitude sustainability from a constructivist-based astronomy-for-teachers course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 47, 366. [Google Scholar]
- Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 231-240. [Google Scholar]
- Trumper, R. (2000). University students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Physics Education, 35(1). [Google Scholar]
- Trumper. R. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts-seasonal changes-at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879-906. [Google Scholar]
- Zeilik, M. (2003), Birth of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test: Prototest Evolution, Astronomy Education Review, 2(1), 46. [Google Scholar]
- Zeilik, M., Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1998). Misconceptions and their change in university-level astronomy courses. The Physics Teacher, 36. [Google Scholar]
- Zeilik, M., Schau, C., Mattern, N., Hall, S., Teague, K. W., & Bisard, W. (1997). Conceptual astronomy: A novel model for teaching postsecondary science courses. American Journal of Physics, 65(10), 987- 996. [Google Scholar]
