International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1309-0682
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
International Association of Educators

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2015, Cil. 9(17) 17-26

The Effect of Graphic Symbol Learning Environments On Verbal Problem Solving Skills Of Hearing-Impaired Students

Yasemin Karal, Hasan Karal, Lokman Şılbır, Ekrem Bahçekapılı & Murat Aatasoy

ss. 17 - 26   |  Makale No: mjer.2015.003

Yayın tarihi: Haziran 01, 2015  |   Okunma Sayısı: 118  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 718

PDF İndir

Özet

Alternative communication means based on graphs such as photos, drawings and picture symbols could be used effectively for hearing- impaired people, but the literature provides few of such examples. Present study investigates the effectiveness of graphic symbol learning environments in problem solving skills of 4 hearing impaired students at elementary 3rd grade. The researchers made a problem pool of 22 items on add subtract. 5 of the problems were selected from the pool to give the students a test. In this way, the participants’ verbal problem solving skills in add subtract were defined in pre- test. Next, the problems were presented in graphic symbols. Each of the sentences in presentations was converted into graphic symbol sentences. It was followed by reading and understanding the problem, discussing given values, students’ noting the problem statement on notebooks (including graphic sentences of the verbal problem only), and the teacher/student solved the problem on the whiteboard. In the end of the practices, the pre test verbal problem was given again after modifying the numbers. It was found in pre tests that the students added all of the numbers in a column. On the contrary, the participants could determine which steps they should do subsequently for each problem in the post test.

Anahtar Kelimeler: graphic symbol, hearing impairment, mathematics, verbal problem

Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Karal, Y., Karal, H., Silbir, L., Bahcekapili, E. & Aatasoy, M. (2015). The Effect of Graphic Symbol Learning Environments On Verbal Problem Solving Skills Of Hearing-Impaired Students . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(17), 17-26.

Harvard
Karal, Y., Karal, H., Silbir, L., Bahcekapili, E. and Aatasoy, M. (2015). The Effect of Graphic Symbol Learning Environments On Verbal Problem Solving Skills Of Hearing-Impaired Students . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(17), pp. 17-26.

Chicago 16th edition
Karal, Yasemin, Hasan Karal, Lokman Silbir, Ekrem Bahcekapili and Murat Aatasoy (2015). "The Effect of Graphic Symbol Learning Environments On Verbal Problem Solving Skills Of Hearing-Impaired Students ". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 9 (17):17-26.

Kaynakça
  1. Albertini, J. A., Kelly, R. R., & Matchett, M. K. (2012). Personal factors that influence deaf college students' academic success. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 17(1), 85-101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ansell, E., & Pagliaro, C. M. (2006). The relative difficulty of signed arithmetic story problems for primary level deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 153-170. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aydın, Y., Şılbır, L., Küçüksüleyman, N., Karal & Altun, T., (2012). Alternatif iletişim aracı olarak türkçe için bir grafik sembol sisteminin tasarımı: standart grafik sembollerin belirlenmesi. 6th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, Gaziantep. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. (2012). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına genel bir bakış. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(42). [Google Scholar]
  5. Blatto-Vallee, G., Kelly, R. R., Gaustad, M. G., Porter, J., & Fonzi, J. (2007). Visual–spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97- 113. [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins, K. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67-100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2006). Understanding mixed methods research, (Chapter 1). Available at: http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/10981_Chapter_1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. Çiftçi, E. (2009). İşitme engelli öğrenciler için hazırlanan bilgisayar destekli yazılı anlatım becerisi geliştirme materyalinin tasarımı, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi). KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 50-64. [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis, T. N., Barnard-Brak, L., Dacus, S., & Pond, A. (2010). Aided aac systems among individuals with hearing loss and disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(3), 241-256. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th Edition), New York: McGraw – Hill International Edition. [Google Scholar]
  13. Glennen, S. L., and Decoste, D. C. (1997). The Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. London: Singular Publishing Group. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224. [Google Scholar]
  15. Heller, K. W., Ware, S., Allgood, M. H., and Castelle, M. (1994). Use of dual communication boards with students who are deaf-blind. Journal of Visual Impairments and Blindness, 88(4), 368–376. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hourcade, J. J., Parette Jr, H. P., Boeckmann, N., & Blum, C. (2010). Handy Manny and the emergent literacy technology toolkit. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(6), 483-491. [Google Scholar]
  17. Inaba, R., Takasaki, T., and Mori, Y. (2006, November). How do kids use pictograms? CSCW '06, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. [Google Scholar]
  19. Karal, H., Aydın, Y., & Günal, Y. (2010). Designing a visual symbol system for Turkish language as an alternative means of communication: the process of delineating content. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 679-684. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karal,Y. (2014). Türkçe için alternatif iletişim aracı olarak bir grafik sembol sisteminin tasarlanması, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi. (Doktora tezi). KTU, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kelly, R. R., & Gaustad, M. G. (2007). Deaf college students' mathematical skills relative to morphological knowledge, reading level, and language proficiency. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(1), 25-37. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koul, R., Corwin, M., & Hayes, S., (2005). Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication ıntervention. Brain and Language, 92, 58-77. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, C. (2010). Middle school deaf student’s problem- solving behaviours and strategy use. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. [Google Scholar]
  24. Marcus, A. (2007). M-LoCoS UI: A universal visible language for global mobile communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 144–153. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pagliaro, C. M., & Kritzer, K. L. (2013). The Math Gap: A Description of the Mathematics Performance of Preschool-aged Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Children.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 18(2), 139-160. [Google Scholar]
  26. Parette, H. P.i, Boeckmann N. M., and Hourcade, J. J. (2008). Use of writing with symbols 2000 software to facilitate emergent literacy development, Early Childhood Educ J, 36,161–170. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), 43-53. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sheehy, K., & Duffy, H. (2009). Attitudes to Makaton in the ages on integration and inclusion. International Journal of Special Education, 24(2), 91-102. [Google Scholar]
  29. Şılbır, L. (2011). İşitme Engelli Öğrencilerin Türkçe Okuma Yazma Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Görsel Yardım Paketi: GÖRYAP. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). KTU, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  30. Takasaki, T. (2006). PictNet: Semantic infrastructure for pictogram communication. In The 3rd International WordNet Conference (GWC-06) (pp. 279-284). [Google Scholar]
  31. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 285. [Google Scholar]
  32. Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The effect of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, 50(5), 1314-1329. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tucker Cohen, E., Allgood, M., Wolff Heller, K., & Castelle, M. (2001). Use of picture dictionaries to promote written communication by students with hearing and cognitive impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(4), 245-254. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van der Merwe, E., & Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(3), 255-274. [Google Scholar]
  35. Waller, A., & Jack, K. (2002, July). A predictive Blissymbolic to English translation system. In Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies (pp. 186-191). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  36. Whittle, H., and Detheridge, T. (2001). The rebus symbols development project. Communication Matters Journal, 15, 3, 14-17. [Google Scholar]
  37.  Zaman, H. B., Zainuddin, N. M. M., and Ahmad, A. (2009). Learning science using ar book: A preliminary study on visual needs of deaf learners. IVIC 2009, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 844–855. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zernovoj, A. (2005). Telling, writing and reading number tales in asl and english academic languages: acquisition and maintenance of mathematical word problem solving skills. Online Submission. [Google Scholar]
İndir
Metric
Geçmiş
Benzer

Cilt 9 Sayı 17

Haziran 2015

Tüm Makaleler

Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Gizlilik     |     Kullanım Koşulları     |     Çerez Politikaları
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.