The Prediction of Collaborative EFL Task Achievement by Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence

İrem Sarı Heshmati & Kadir Kozan

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.153.4

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2018, Cil. 12(25) 60-75

The Prediction of Collaborative EFL Task Achievement by Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence

İrem Sarı Heshmati & Kadir Kozan

ss. 60 - 75 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.153.4 | Makale No: MANU-1807-18-0001.R1

Yayın tarihi: Ekim 01, 2018 | Okunma Sayısı: 153 | İndirilme Sayısı: 833

PDF İndir

Özet

This study investigated how well teaching, social and cognitive presence would predict collaborative task achievement in an English language learning context. Specifically, it was conducted at the prep school of a private, not-for-profit university in [country]. A total of 169 students at a pre-intermediate level of proficiency participated in the study. The study employed an ex post facto research design along with an explanatory sequential mixed method. The survey results were analyzed through a standard multiple regression analysis accompanied by qualitative data analysis of semi-structured interviews. The interview results were mainly used for descriptive purposes. The survey results revealed that the participants regarded the learning environment as a community of inquiry; yet, the predictive power of the presences as a group was non-significant. Moreover, the presences could not significantly predict task achievement individually either. In other words, no predictive relationship was found between the presences and the collaborative task achievement despite their relatively adequate levels involved in the target learning context as suggested by survey ratings and interview results.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Collaborative EFL Task Achievement, Cognitive Presence, Teaching Presence, Social Presence

Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Heshmati, I.S. & Kozan, K. (2018). The Prediction of Collaborative EFL Task Achievement by Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(25), 60-75. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2018.153.4

Harvard
Heshmati, I. and Kozan, K. (2018). The Prediction of Collaborative EFL Task Achievement by Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(25), pp. 60-75.

Chicago 16th edition
Heshmati, Irem Sari and Kadir Kozan (2018). "The Prediction of Collaborative EFL Task Achievement by Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 12 (25):60-75. doi:10.29329/mjer.2018.153.4.

Kaynakça

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3- 22. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250. Akyol, Z., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123-136. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 40-56. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133-136 Bangert, A.W. (2009). Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 104-111. Beckmann, J., & Weber, P. (2016). Cognitive presence in virtual collaborative learning: Assessing and improving critical thinking in online discussion forums. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(1), 52-70. Caskurlu, S. (2018). Confirming the subdimensions of teaching, social and cognitive presences: A construct validity study. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 1-12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications. Cross, K. P. (1998). Why learning communities? Why now?. About Campus, 3(3), 4-11. Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216-227. De Lisle, J. (2011). The benefits and challenges of mixing methods and methodologies: Lessons learnt from implementing qualitatively led mixed methods research designs in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Curriculum, 18(1), 87-120. Diaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 22-30. Edstrom, A. (2015). Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task. System, 52(1), 26-37. Fjuk, A., & Holmfeld, D. (1997). Articulation of actions in distributed collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 1. Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of quality online education: Practice and Direction, 4(1), 47-58. Garrison, D. R. (2006). Online collaboration principles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 25-34. Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers, G. A. Berg, J. V. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. D. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp. 352-355) (2nd ed.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: Taylor & Francis. Garrison, D. R. (2013). Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights of the community of inquiry. In Akyol Z. (Ed.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research, and practice (pp. 1-11). USA: IGI Global. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions.The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough.The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31-36. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology and Education, 7(1), 22-30. Han, S. Y., & Hill, J. R. (2007). Collaborate to learn, learn to collaborate: Examining the roles of context, community, and cognition in asynchronous discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 89-123. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25. Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21-39. Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808-820. Kozan, K. (2016a). A comparative structural equation modeling investigation of the relationships among teaching, cognitive, and social presence. Online Learning Journal, 20(3), 210-227. Kozan, K. (2016b). The incremental predictive validity of teaching, cognitive and social presence on cognitive load. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 11-19. Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014b). New exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis insights into the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 39-47. Kozan, K., & Richardson, J.C. (2014a). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68-73. Liu, S. Y., Gomez, J., & Yen, C. J. (2009). Community college online course retention and final grade: Predictability of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 165-182. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Organization and Analysis of Qualitative Research Data. Methods in educational research: From Theory to Practice (First Ed., pp. 300-314). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.  Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 207-228.  Lord, H. G. (1973). Ex Post Facto Studies as a Research Method. (Special Report No. 7320) Retrived from ERIC website: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090962.pdf MacGregor, J., & Leigh Smith, B. (2005). Where are learning communities now? National leaders take stock. About Campus, 10(2), 2-8. Öztürk, E. (2012). An adaptation of the community of inquiry index: The study of validity and reliability. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 408-422. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15. Nova Iorque: McGraw Hill. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. New Bury Park: SAGE Publications. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. InO’Malley C. (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (Vol. 128, pp. 69-97). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316-326. Slagter van Tryon, P. J., & Bishop, M. J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3), 291-315. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. Swain, M. (1997). Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34(1), 115-132. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97, 114. Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). 9. Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185. Swan, K., Richardson, J.C., Ice, P., Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1-12. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. Zirkin, B., & Sumler, D. (2008). Interactive or Non-interactive?: That Is the Question!!!. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 10(1), 95- 112. [Google Scholar]

Cilt 12 Sayı 25

Eylül 2018

Tüm Makaleler